土地利用冲突分析:概念与方法
The Progress and Prospect of Land Use Conflicts
查看参考文献46篇
文摘
|
随着人口的快速增长和城市化的发展.土地利用冲突的形势会变得越来越严峻.并成为可持续土地利用的主要障碍。有限的土地资源与不断增长的多样化需求是冲突的自然和社会根源,并表现为土地利用在经济利益、生态与环境效益、社会效益之间的矛盾;农牧交错带、水陆过渡带和城乡过渡带则是土地利用冲突发生的热点区域。文章还介绍了参与式调查、多目标规划等方法及其在土地利用冲突中的可能应用。未来土地利用冲突研究的重点应该放在追踪土地利用冲突的动态变化上面,并利用科学的方法来缓解冲突的发生,实现土地利用的综合协调管理。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Varied demands of society for the limited land are leading to an overlay of interests and thus to land use conflicts. Moreover, the conflicts are exacerbated by the rapid increase of population and urban expansion on both regional and global scale, which is an obstacle for sustainable land use. It is becoming inci'easingly challenging for local and national government over land management. Thereby, the study of land use conflicts plays an important role in the realization of sustainable land use. This article examines the causes of land use conflicts from both physical and social-economic dimensions, and regards that scarces of land resource and increasing conflicting demands for land should be responsible for land use conflicts. Conflicts among economical, environmental and social objectives are this articles main contents. Farmingpastoral region, water-land ecotone and urban-rural fringe are the three hotspots of multiple conflicts. The article also describes familiar methods used in the study of resource use conflicts, with a hope to help the study of land use conflicts. There is still a long way to define and understand the concept of land use conflict and its connotation, to pursue its driving forces and countermeasures. In the future the emphases of land use conflicts study should focus on tracing and monitoring the dynamics of land use conflicts in order to create a better basis for understanding the conflicts and also on the contrast of internal and external conflicts from the context of occurrence and evolution. The models or tools should also be developed at the same time in order to reduce land use conflicts in terms of a regional management of environment and natural resources. |
来源
|
地理科学进展
,2006,25(3):106-115 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
土地利用冲突
;
利益相关者
;
利益冲突
;
热点区域
;
土地利用综合管理
|
地址
|
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京, 100101
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1007-6301 |
学科
|
社会科学总论;自然地理学 |
基金
|
国家“十五”科技攻关项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2509303
|
参考文献 共
46
共3页
|
1.
William M Adams. Managing Tragedies:Understanding Conflict over Common Pool Resources.
Science,2003,302:1915-1916
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
张德.
组织行为学,1999,75
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
3.
David J Campbell. Land use conflict in kajiado District.
Land Use Policy,2000,17:337-348
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
4.
李平. 我国现阶段土地利用变化驱动力的宏观分析.
地理研究,2001,20(2):129-138
|
CSCD被引
187
次
|
|
|
|
5.
刘盛和. 城市土地利用扩展的空间模式与动力机制.
地理科学进展,2002,21(1):43-50
|
CSCD被引
63
次
|
|
|
|
6.
周道纬.
北方农牧交错带东段草地退化与水土流失,1999,21(5):57-61
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
于伯华. 基于DPSIR概念模型的农业可持续发展宏观分析.
中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(5):68-72
|
CSCD被引
30
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Grimble R.
Agricultural Systems,1997,55(2):173-193
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
9.
蔡玉梅. FAO土地利用规划研究进展评述.
地理科学进展,2005,24(1):70-78
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
10.
FAO.
http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/9810/spot4.htm,1998
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
.
http://www.nplnews.com/dox/blmplanning/ib2004~128attach2.pdf,2004
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Adaptation Division.
http://www.agr.calpolicy/adapt,1999
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Anantha K Duraiappah.
International Institute for Environment and Development,London,and Institute for Environmental Studies,2000
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
14.
李秀彬. 土地利用变化的解释.
地理科学进展,2002,21(3):195-203
|
CSCD被引
157
次
|
|
|
|
15.
David J Campbell. Land use conflict in Kajiado District.
Land Use Policy,2000,17:337-348
|
CSCD被引
33
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Harry Spaling.
Land use policy,1996,15(2):105-118
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
17.
何彤慧. 由宁夏中部地区的资源开发看生态建设的整体性.
经济地理,2002,22(5):612-615
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
18.
Iain Fraser. Conservation or cultural heritage?Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park.
Ecological Economics,2000,33:63-75
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
19.
Hilson G. An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities.
Land Use Policy,2002,19:65-73
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
20.
Paul Cloke.
Geoforum,1996,21(2):159-174
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|