中国人人格结构探索——人格特质六因素假说
Searching for a Personality Structure of Chinese: A Theoretical Hypothesis of a Six Factor Model of Personality Traits
查看参考文献49篇
|
文摘
|
研究人格特质背后潜在的结构一直是人格心理学家们工作的一项重要内容,因而存在着人格结构因素(维度)之争;而论证某一人格特质结构的文化普适性(etic)或者文化特殊性(emic),则成为当今人格特质研究者们工作的一个重要方向,因而存在着彼一人格结构与此一人格结构能否相容之争.文章回顾总结了20多年来有关<中国人个性测量表CPAI>的实证研究结果,提出了一个人格特质"六因素"假说(SFM),并通过比较中国人和美国人样本在"六因素"结构中的"人际关系性(IR)"和"开放性(O)"因素上的显性/隐性表现,指出人格因素数量及其理论定性之争很可能仅具有方法学意义,对于真正了解人格的本质并非关键.真正找到人类共有的和某一人群特有的人格特质结构的唯一途径,只能是各种文化背景下的人格心理学家超越各自理论、彼此平等接纳、从文化的、乃至遗传的角度共同探索. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Finding a latent structure for personality traits has been consistently one of the focuses in personality research, while finding empirical evidence of culture-general or culture-specific nature for a personality structure is at present one of the important topics in personality research. Therefore, it can be seen that there have disputation over the number of factors （or dimensions） for such a personality structure, and over the adaptability of a structure from one culture to people of another culture. The present paper summarizes various findings resulted from a series of studies on CPAI （Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory） over the past period of 20 years to put forward a Six Factor Model （SFM）. Based on the responses to IR and O factor of SFM from the samples of Chinese and American, the paper therefore suggest that the number of factors and culture-specific nature in any of the existing personality structures be only meaningful in terms of methodology and epistemology adopted by its researchers. The only way to fmd a personality structure of culture-general or culture-specific is to let personality psychologists of many cultural backgrounds work together equally. |
|
来源
|
心理科学进展
,2006,14(4):574-585 【扩展库】
|
|
关键词
|
人格特质结构
;
CPAI
;
NEO-PI
;
六因素模型
;
人际关系性
;
开放性
;
文化普适性/文化特殊性
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1671-3710 |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2458563
|
参考文献 共
49
共3页
|
|
1.
Allport G W.
Personality:A psychological interpretation,1937
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Eysenck H J.
The biological basis of personality,1967
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
McAdam D P. The five-factor model in personality:A critical appraisal.
Journal of Personality,1992,63:525-568
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
McCrae R R. Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology.
American Psychologist,1986,41:1001-1003
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
McCrae R R. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,52:81-90
|
CSCD被引
22
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
McCrae R R. Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems:The California Q-Set and the five-factor model.
Journal of Personality,1986,54:430-446
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Noller P. Cattell.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,53:775-782
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Peabody D. Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1989,52:937-945
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Digman J M. Personality structure:Emergence of the five-factor model.
Annual Review of Psychology,1990,41:417-440
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Goldberg L R. The development of markers for the Big-five factor structure.
Psychological Assessment,1992,4:26-42
|
CSCD被引
21
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Benet-Martinez V. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups:Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,75:729-750
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Church A T.
Journal of Personality,1997,65:477-528
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Digman J M. The structure of temperament and personality in Russian children.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71:341-351
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Katigbak M S. Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific?Philippine inventories and the five-factor model.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2002,82:89-101
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
McCrae R R. Personality trait structure as a human universal.
American Psychologist,1997,52:509-516
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Paunonen S V. Personality structure across cultures:A multimethod evaluation.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992,62:447-456
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Saucier G. Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors:Premises.
Journal of Personality,2001,69:847-879
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Somer O. The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,76:431-450
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Yang K. Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs:The Chinese case.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,58:1087-1095
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
杨国枢.
中国人的蜕变,1965
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问