帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

发展中的行为决策研究
One Year of Progress in Research on Behavioral Decision-Making

查看参考文献54篇

李纾  
文摘 行为决策研究人们如何进行判断与选择.该学科希望能在描述决策的过程中帮助人们更好地进行决策,其研究的使命是促进和改善我们对人类决策行为的理解.在过去的1年里,中国科学院心理研究所行为决策课题组在社会与经济决策领域中已开展的研究包括:行为决策与脑、社会互动与决策、决策的文化差异、消费与投资的行为决策、效用最大化与幸福感.该文着重报告并讨论了我们在行为决策及其跨文化比较研究中的一些最新的主要发现.
其他语种文摘 Behavioral decision making is the study of how people make decisions. It hopes to describe these processes in ways that will eventually help people to make better decisions. Nowadays, the understanding and improvement of decision behavior continues to be an important area of research. In this invited paper, the Team of Behavioral Decision Making at Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, its research areas and its orientation were debriefed. The most recent research results of the team members since 2005 were presented and discussed. The team's mission was recognized as to foster an understanding of those elements of human behavior, both cognitive and affective (emotional) that influence the decision-making process in all social and economic contexts and settings.
来源 心理科学进展 ,2006,14(4):490-496 【扩展库】
关键词 行为决策与脑 ; 社会互动 ; 跨文化差异 ; 消费与投资 ; 幸福感
地址

中国科学院心理研究所"行为决策"课题组, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
文献类型 研究性论文
ISSN 1671-3710
学科 社会科学总论
基金 中国科学院“百人计划”项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:2458550

参考文献 共 54 共3页

1.  Naylor J. Editor's preface. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1994,60:301 CSCD被引 1    
2.  Edwards W. The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin,1954,51:380-417 CSCD被引 16    
3.  Li S. A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence,2004,20:147-163 CSCD被引 32    
4.  Li S. Equate-to-differentiate approach:An application in binary choice under uncertainty. Central European Journal of Operations Research,2004,12(3):269-294 CSCD被引 13    
5.  Li S. Violations of conjoint independence in binary choices:The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. European Journal of Operational Research,2003,148:65-79 CSCD被引 10    
6.  Li S. Equate-to-differentiate:The role of shared and unique features in the judgment process. Australian Journal of Psychology,2001,53:109-118 CSCD被引 6    
7.  Li S. Extended research on dominance violations in similarity judgments:The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving,2001,11:13-38 CSCD被引 5    
8.  李纾. 艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释. 心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181 CSCD被引 10    
9.  Li S. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,1993,6:271-281 CSCD被引 11    
10.  Li S. An alternative way of seeing the Allais-type violations of the sure-thing principle. Humanomics,2004,20:17-31 CSCD被引 8    
11.  Li S. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1995,27:453-463 CSCD被引 10    
12.  Li S. What is the price for utilizing deductive reasoning?A reply to generalized expectation maximizers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1996,29(2):355-358 CSCD被引 8    
13.  Li S. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1995,62:216-219 CSCD被引 12    
14.  Li S. Journal of Economic Psychology,1998,19:135-155 CSCD被引 3    
15.  李纾. 再探框架对风险决策行为的影响. 心理学报,2000,32(2):229-234 CSCD被引 25    
16.  Li S. An additional violation of transitivity and independence between alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology,1996,17:645-650 CSCD被引 4    
17.  Li S. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1994,60:353-366 CSCD被引 6    
18.  Li S. Psychological Reports,1994,74:675-679 CSCD被引 3    
19.  Li S. The role of expected value illustrated in decision-making under risk:single-play vs multiple-play. Journal of Risk Research,2003,6(2):113-124 CSCD被引 10    
20.  李纾. 不确定状态下决择:为什么说富人进天堂比骆驼穿过针眼还难. (台湾)应用心理学报,2000,8:19-29 CSCD被引 3    
引证文献 13

1 刘立秋 Linda问题:“齐当别”抉择模型的解释 心理科学进展,2007,15(5):735-742
CSCD被引 3

2 陈欣 两难中合作行为研究的回顾和展望 心理科学进展,2007,15(5):743-748
CSCD被引 5

显示所有13篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

iAuthor 链接
李纾 0000-0003-4402-1674
版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护:中国科学院文献情报中心
地址:北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码:100190 联系电话:(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号