帮助 关于我们

返回检索结果

变革型领导与员工工作态度:心理授权的中介作用
Transformational Leadership and Employee Work Attitudes: The Mediating Effects of Multidimensional Psychological Empowerment

查看参考文献40篇

李超平 1   田宝 2   时勘 3  
文摘 研究的主要目的是考察变革型领导与员工满意度、组织承诺之间的关系,以及变革型领导的作用机制,即变革型领导是否会通过心理授权影响员工满意度与组织承诺.利用14家企业744份调查问卷的结果,采用结构方程模型技术对变革型领导、心理授权、员工满意度、组织承诺之间的关系进行了交叉验证分析.结果表明,愿景激励与德行垂范对组织承诺与员工满意度有显著的影响,而领导魅力与个性化关怀只对员工满意度有显著的影响;心理授权对变革型领导与员工工作态度的关系具有一定的中介作用,愿景激励与德行垂范通过工作意义影响员工满意度与组织承诺;愿景激励通过自我效能影响组织承诺.
其他语种文摘 Accumulating evidence suggests that transformational leadership is positively associated with such leadership effectiveness as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance, and OCB. However few studies have examined relations between the components of transformational leadership and different work outcomes. Also the mechanisms and processes by which transformational leadership exerts its influence have not been adequately addressed in the literature. More work is also needed to examine constructs that may mediate the linkage between transformational leadership and work outcomes. As proposed by Vandeenberghe （ 1999）, psychological empowerment may be a powerful mediator of transformational leadership effects. In the present study, we explored the relations among different components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction and organizational commitment in a Chinese context. We also examined the contribution of each of the four dimensions of Thomas and Vehhouse＇s （1990） multidimensional conceptualization of psychological empowerment in mediating the relation between transformational leadership and job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. The following measures were administered to a sample of 744 employees from 14 companies： The Transformational Leadership Questionnaire （TLQ） developed by Li and Shi （2005） ; the Psychological Empowerment Scale （PES） developed by Spreitzer （1995） ; the Job Satisfaction Scale developed by Tsui, Egan and OReilly Ⅲ （1992）, and the Affective Commitment Scale developed by Allen and Meyer （1996）. All scales were subjected to reliability analysis and factor analysis before data analysis. Internal consistency reliability estimates ranged from 0.69 to 0.89, suggesting adequate reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） results supported the four-dimension structure （ morale modeling, visionary motivating, charisma and individualized consideration） of the TLQ. CFA results also confirmed the four-dimension （ meaning, competence, self-determination and impact） structure of the PES. Finally, exploratory factor analysis extracted one factor from the job satisfaction items and a single factor was also extracted from the affective commitment items. Structure equations modeling （SEM） was used to explore the relations among transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, job satisfaction and organizational commitment using the model generation strategy described by Joereskog ＆ Soerbom （1996）. The data were randomly split into two parts. One part was submitted to an exploratory SEM and the other part was submitted to a confirmatory SEM. The exploratory SEM began with a fully-mediated model in which the components of psychological empowerment fully mediated the relations between the components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Some meaningful adjustment was made according to the modification index （MI） generated by AMOS 4.0 until a statistically acceptable model was derived. This model was then submitted to a confirmatory SEM which yielded satisfactory goodness of fit statistics, including χ^2/df, GFI, NFI, IFI, TLI, and CFI. The results showed that different components of transformational leadership had different impact on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Specifically, morale modeling and visionary motivating were powerful predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment, respectively; charisma and individualized consideration were robust predictors of job satisfaction but not of organizational commitment. To some extent, psychological empowerment mediated the relation between transformational leadership and employee work attitude. Specifically, meaning mediated the relation between visionary motivation and job satisfaction as well as organizational commitment. Meaning also mediated the relation between moral modeling and job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Similarly, competence mediated the relation between visionary motivation and organizational commitment. However, neither self-determination nor impact mediated the relation between components of transformational leadership and job satisfaction or organizational commitment. And non-component of psychological empowerment mediated the relation between charisma and individualized consideration and job satisfaction. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
来源 心理学报 ,2006,38(2):297-307 【核心库】
关键词 变革型领导问卷 ; 心理授权 ; 员工满意度 ; 组织承诺 ; 交叉验证
地址

1. 中国人民大学公共管理学院组织与人力资源研究所, 北京, 100872  

2. 首都师范大学教科院心理系, 北京, 100089  

3. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京, 100101

语种 中文
ISSN 0439-755X
学科 社会科学总论
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目
文献收藏号 CSCD:2361966

参考文献 共 40 共2页

1.  Bums J M. Leadership. Leadership,1978 CSCD被引 5 次    
2.  Bass B M. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations,1985 CSCD被引 67 次    
3.  Bass B M. Theory of Transformational Leadership Redux. The Leadership Quarterly,1995,6(4):463-478 CSCD被引 25 次    
4.  Bryman A. Some Neglected Issues. The Leadership Quarterly,1993,4(3/4):289-304 CSCD被引 5 次    
5.  House R J. Past Perspectives and Future Directions for Research. Leadership Effectiveness:Past Perspectives and Future Directions for Research,1999:1-54 CSCD被引 2 次    
6.  House R J. Quo Vadis. Journal of Management,1997,23(3):409-474 CSCD被引 14 次    
7.  Hater J J. Superiors'Evaluations and Subordinates'Perceptions of Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,1988,73(4):695-702 CSCD被引 5 次    
8.  Howell J M. Transformational Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,1993,78(6):891-902 CSCD被引 14 次    
9.  Bycio P. Furthur Assessments of Bass's. Journal of Applied Psychology,1985,80:468-478 CSCD被引 1 次    
10.  Judge T A. Five-Factor Model of Personality and Transformational Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(5):751-765 CSCD被引 9 次    
11.  Kirkpatrick S A. Direct and Indirect Effects of Three Core Charismatic Leadership Components on Performance and Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81(1):36-51 CSCD被引 5 次    
12.  Shea C M. A Laboratory Study of Their Effects on Self-Efficacy and Task Performance. The Leadership Quarterly,1999,10(3):375-396 CSCD被引 3 次    
13.  Jung D I. An Experimental Investigation of the Mediating Effects of Trust and Value Congruence on Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2000,21(8):949-964 CSCD被引 9 次    
14.  Barling J. A Field Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology,1996,81(6):827-832 CSCD被引 8 次    
15.  Lowe K B. A MetaAnalytic Review of the MLQ Literature. Leadership Quarterly,1996,7(3):385-425 CSCD被引 20 次    
16.  李超平. 变革型领导的结构与测量. 心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811 CSCD被引 45 次    
17.  Bass B M. Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1999,8(1):9-26 CSCD被引 20 次    
18.  Vandenberghe C. Transactional Vs. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,1999,8(1):9-32 CSCD被引 4 次    
19.  Thomas K W. An "Interpretive" Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. Academy of Management Review,1990,15(4):666-681 CSCD被引 59 次    
20.  Bass B M. 1992 and Beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training,1990,14(5):21-27 CSCD被引 12 次    
引证文献 32 篇

1 李燕萍 与领导关系好就能获得职业成功吗?一项调节的中介效应研究 心理学报,2011,43(8):941-952
CSCD被引 13 次

2 时勘 基于胜任特征模型的人力资源开发 心理科学进展,2006,14(4):586-595
CSCD被引 16 次

显示所有32篇文献

论文科学数据集
PlumX Metrics
相关文献

 作者相关
 关键词相关
 参考文献相关

版权所有 ©2008 中国科学院文献情报中心 制作维护：中国科学院文献情报中心
地址：北京中关村北四环西路33号 邮政编码：100190 联系电话：(010)82627496 E-mail:cscd@mail.las.ac.cn 京ICP备05002861号-4 | 京公网安备11010802043238号