关于条件推理的ERP研究
An ERP Study on Conditional Reasoning
查看参考文献16篇
文摘
|
以抽象的条件命题作为实验材料,测定13名大学生在完成MP、AC、DA、MT推理(推测判断任务)和基线任务(记忆判断任务)时的事件相关电位(ERP),初步探讨不同推理类型的脑内时程动态变化.这是使用ERP技术来研究条件推理脑机制的初步尝试.结果发现,五种任务所诱发的ERP早成分均不存在显著差异,在头皮前部的左外侧额区和左颞区,MP与DA推理与基线任务相比,均诱发一个更明显的晚期正成分(450~1100ms),在右外侧额区则诱发一个更明显的晚期负成分(450~1100ms);与之相反,MT与AC推理与基线任务相比,在左侧诱发一个更明显的晚期负成分(450~1100ms),在右侧诱发一个更明显的晚期正成分(450~1100ms),这一结果可能是由于左右脑在推理中的认知功能以及四种推理类型之间存在的差异所致,同时也表明推测过程主要激活了左右侧的前额部、颞叶等区域,基本支持Goel等人的双加工理论. |
其他语种文摘
|
Event-related brain potentials were measured when 13 normal young participants finished four kinds of conditional reasoning (MP, AC, DA, MT)tasks and one kind of baseline task(BS). Results showed that there were no amplitude modulations of early components. However MP and DA elicited a more positive EPR deflection on the left and a more negative EPR deflection on the right hemisphere than did BS task in the time window from 450 - 1100 msec after onset of the stimuli 2. On the contrary MT and AC elicited a more negative EPR deflection on the left and a more positive EPR deflection on the right hemisphere than did BS task in the time window form 450 - 1100 msec. These ERP components elicited by five different tasks might reflect that right and left hemisphere have different ability of cognitive process in reasoning. In additional Voltage map of the difference wave between reasoning tasks and baseline task showed strong activity in frontal-temporal pathway, Our result support dual-process theory (Goel). |
来源
|
心理学报
,2006,38(1):7-14 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
条件推理
;
规则理论
;
模型理论
;
事件相关电位
|
地址
|
西南大学心理学院, 重庆, 400715
|
语种
|
中文 |
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目
;
国家重点学科(基础心理学)建设项目
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2321566
|
参考文献 共
16
共1页
|
1.
Braine M D S. On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.
Psychological Review,1978,85(1):1-21
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Johnson-Laird P N. a theory of meaning.
Psychological Review,2002,109(4):646-678
|
CSCD被引
15
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Evans B T. Conditionals and conditional probability.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,Cognition,2003,29(2):321-335
|
CSCD被引
8
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Evans B T. an assessment of the deduction paradigm.
Psychological Bulletin,2002,128(6):978-996
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Johnson-Laird P N. Mental models.
Mental models,1983
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
6.
Evans B T. dual-process accounts of reasoning.
Trends in cognitive science,2003,7(10):454-459
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Goel V. Evidence for dual neural pathways for syllogistic reasoning.
Psychologia,2003,32:301-309
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Noveck I A. The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content.
Cortex,2004,40:613-622
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
9.
Deglin V L. how syllogisms are solved during transitory hemisphere suppression.
Brain cognition,1996,31:285-307
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Wharton C M. Deductive reasoning and the brain.
Trends of cognitive sciences,1998,2(2):54-59
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
11.
Goel V. Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning.
NeuroImage,2000,12(5):504-514
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
12.
Goel V. Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning.
Neuropsychologia,2001,39(9):901-909
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
13.
Goel V. Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief.
Cognition,2003,87:B11-B22
|
CSCD被引
16
次
|
|
|
|
14.
Goel V. Asymmetrical involvement of frontal lobes in social reasoning.
Brain,2004,127:783-790
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
15.
RuffC. common and distinct neuronal processes.
Neuropsychologia,2003,41:1241-1253
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
16.
Knauff M. a functional MRI study.
Cognitive Brain Research,2002,13:203-212
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|