知道感与不知道感:一个关于元记忆判断的双过程假设
Feeling-of-Knowing and Feeling-of-not-Knowing: A Dual-process Hypothesis on Metamemory Judgments
查看参考文献45篇
|
文摘
|
最新的认知神经科学证据显示:"知道感"(FOK,feeling-of-knowing)与"不知道感"(FOnK,feeling-of-notknowing)是由两种不同的认知与脑机制所实现的.这一设想质疑了自Hart以来的知道感研究中对二者不加区分的处理方法并具有重要的理论意义.目前知道感研究中具有代表性的可接近模型(Accessibility Model)认为:可获得的相关信息总量决定知道感的高低,信息的总量越多,知道感判断就越高.而"双过程假设"则认为:人们具有对各种已获得的信息加以鉴别的能力,能够把与实际回忆的成败确实有关的"相关信息"与实际上无效的"无关信息"区别开来,对"相关信息"的认可促成了FOK,而对"无关信息"的抑制和正确否定则促成了FOnK. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
Although studies on feeling-of-knowing （FOK） generally assume it is a continuum that varies from weak to strong, recent neuroimaging studies indicated FOK and feeling-of-not-knowing （FOnK） involved different neural networks. This suggested FOK and FOnK might be supported by distinct cognitive brain processes and implied a dual-process model of FOK. In this paper, some theoretical aspects of this model were considered. Different from the accessibility model that postulated FOK relied on the accessibility of retrieved information, dual-process model proposed the accessible information were to be evaluated and discriminated by metamemory mechanism. The task-related part of the information was accepted and taken in the metamemo,7 prediction, constituting the positive FOK, whereas the task-unrelated part of the information was rejected and excluded from the metamemo,7 prediction, constituting the negative FOnK. The behavioral evidences that supported the dual-process model were also discussed. |
|
来源
|
心理学报
,2006,38(1):145-156 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
元记忆
;
知道感(FOK)
;
不知道感(FOnK)
|
|
地址
|
中国科学院心理研究所, 中科院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
ISSN
|
0439-755X |
|
学科
|
社会科学总论 |
|
基金
|
首都师范大学北京市学习与认知重点实验室项目
;
国家自然科学基金面上项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:2321562
|
参考文献 共
45
共3页
|
|
1.
Hart J T. Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience.
Journal of Educational Psychology,1965,56:208-216
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.
Psychological Review,1993,100:609-639
|
CSCD被引
14
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Koriat A. Further evidence for the accessibility model.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1995,124:311-333
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Nelson T O. Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,1984,113:282-300
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
沈大为. FOK判断产生机制的研究进展.
心理科学,1999,22:156-158
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Metcalfe J. Novelty monitoring.
Psychological Review,1993,100:3-22
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Reder L M. Strategy selection in question answering.
Cognitive Psychology,1987,19:90-138
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Luo J. Knowing that You Know and Knowing that You don't Know:A Fmri Study on Feeling-of-Knowing(FOK).
Acta Psychologica Sinica,2004,36:426-433
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
罗劲. 准确FOK判断与成功线索回忆的大脑活动要似性——来自fMRIr的证据.
自然科学进展,2003,13:263-268
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
罗劲. 准确FOK判断与成功线索回忆的大脑活动要似性——来自fMRIr的证据.
自然科学进展,2003,13:263-268
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Nolde S F. The role of prefrontal during test of episodic memory.
Trends in Cognitive Science,1998,2:399-406
|
CSCD被引
9
次
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Fletcher P C. Shallice T.
Brain,1998,121:1249-1256
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Reder L M. Strategic control of retrieval strategies.
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,1988,22:227-259
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Schwartz B L. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgment.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1992,18:1074-1083
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Metcalfe J. Schwartz B L.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory and Cognition,1993,19:851-861
|
CSCD被引
7
次
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Reder L M. What determines initial feeling of knowing?Familiarity with question terms.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1992,18:435-451
|
CSCD被引
6
次
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Schunn C D. A source activation confusion (SAC) model of problem-familiarity's role in strategy seleetion.
Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,1997,23:3-29
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
18.
韩凯. FOK产生机制的实验研究.
心理科学,1997,20:485-489
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
19.
罗劲. 对FOK的线索熟悉性假说的重新检验.
心理学报,1998,30:241-247
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
20.
罗劲. FOK的线索熟悉性假说与线索熟悉性判断.
心理学报,1999,31:121-127
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问