社会认知偏离量表编制及其军队青年常模
Development of social cognition bias scale and military youth norm
查看参考文献11篇
|
文摘
|
目的: 使用社会认知信息加工理论来评估行为和心理偏离.方法: 适应不良行为如攻击和抑郁等是通过心理加工--行为反应联结构成的,并与特定的知识结构有关.按照"品行障碍和抑郁的发展模型",行为偏离与早期经验、知识结构和社会信息加工相联系.依据这一模型编制了51题的社会认知偏离问卷评估攻击、抑郁和焦虑.11606名中国军事人员完成了评定,收回有效答卷10 891,有效率是93.8%.结果: 问卷的α信度系数为0.81,其与中国人个性评定量表相应分量表的校标关联效度均在0.66以上.该问卷的区分效度显示高分组在加工两半球协同任务时其速度和精确度均低于对照组.结论: 该问卷作为青年军人常模具有一定的信度和效度. |
|
其他语种文摘
|
AIM: To evaluate the behavioral and psychological deviation by using social cognitive processing theory. MATHODS: Some maladaptive social behaviors, such as aggression and depression, were formed through mental process behavioral response linkages and were related to special knowledge structures. According to " Models of the development of conduct disorder and depression" ( Dodge, 1993), deviant behaviors were associated with different parts of the early experiences, knowledge structures and the ways of social information processing. Based on this model, a51-itemed of Social Cognition Bias Scale was developed to measure aggression, depression and anxiety and 11606 Chinese military youth were tested with the scale. RESULTS; The reliability Coefficient a of the scale was . 81. Its criterion-related validity with Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory subscales was over 0. 66. The discriminant validation revealed that high score group showed decreased speed and accuracy in processing interhemi-spheric cooperative tasks compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: Our 51-itemed of Social Cognition Bias Scale has good reliability and validity for this large sample in setting military youth norms. |
|
来源
|
第四军医大学学报
,2004,25(22):2031-2034 【核心库】
|
|
关键词
|
认知
;
偏离
;
异常心理评估
;
常模
;
可重复性,结果
|
|
地址
|
1.
中国科学院心理学研究所, 北京, 100101
2.
北京军区总医院门诊部, 北京, 100700
|
|
语种
|
中文 |
|
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
|
ISSN
|
1000-2790 |
|
学科
|
基础医学 |
|
基金
|
全军医学科研“十五”重点项目
|
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:1794194
|
参考文献 共
11
共1页
|
|
1.
孙时进. 社会心理学[M].
社会心理学,2003:57
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
2.
周榕(译). 人格科学[M].
人格科学,2001:405-418
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Dodge K A. A.
Ann Review Psychol,1993,44:559-584
|
CSCD被引
4
次
|
|
|
|
|
4.
张倩. 攻击行为儿童大脑半球某些认知特点的研究.
心理学报,1999,31(1):104-110
|
CSCD被引
5
次
|
|
|
|
|
5.
宋维真. 编制中国人个性测量表（CPAI）的意义与程序.
心理学报,1993,25(4):400-407
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
6.
张倩. 不同干扰条件下社会认知偏离者两半球协同功能研究 [D].
不同干扰条件下社会认知偏离者两半球协同功能研究,2004
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Funder. Personality[J].
Ann Review Psychol,2001,52:197-221
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Dodge K A. Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children[J].
Child Dev,2003,74(2):374-393
|
CSCD被引
17
次
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Dodge K A. Correlations with aggressive behavior problems[J].
Psychol Assess,2002,14(1):60-73
|
CSCD被引
3
次
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Yoon J. A metaanalytic review[J].
Cognit Behav Practice,1999,6(4):320-331
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Wood C N. Behavioral response generation and selection of rejected-reactive aggressive.
Child Family Behavior Ther,2002,24(3):1-19
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
了解气象卫星更多信息，请访问