|
贵阳市小型燃煤锅炉烟气中汞的形态及释放
Mercury Speciation and Emissions in the Flue Gas of a Small-Scale Coal-Fired Boiler in Guiyang
查看参考文献10篇
文摘
|
选择贵阳市某厂的1台安装有湿法脱硫除尘的燃煤锅炉,研究湿法脱硫除尘前后燃煤烟气中颗粒态汞(Hgp)、氧化态汞(Hg2+)、原子态汞(Hg~0)以及总汞(Hgt)的含量和形态分布。结果显示,湿法脱硫除尘后的颗粒态汞、氧化态汞、原子态汞分别约占总汞的lo.4%,6.0%,83.6%。湿法脱硫除尘器对氧化态汞与颗粒态汞有很好的去除效率(分别为87.9%,76.1%),而对原子态汞的去除效率较差(为30.4%)。由于对该锅炉的年燃煤量统计有一定的误差以及烟气采样分析方法本身存在的误差,该锅炉输出的总汞略大于输入的总汞,质量平衡结果为:输出/输入:103.6%~107.4%。煤经过燃烧后,总汞的释放因子为:41.7%残留在底灰中,65.7%进入烟气中,其中经过湿法脱硫除尘器的净化,26.7%的汞随除尘废水排放到水环境中,7.8%存在于经过除尘后的渣中,25.05%随清洁烟气释放到大气中。 |
其他语种文摘
|
Chemical speciation and distribution of mercury in the flue gas were studied in a small-scale coal-fired boiler with wet flue gas precipitator and desulfurization(WFGPD) system of Guiyang.In the flue gas cleaned by the WFGPD system, the percentage of Hgp , Hg2* and Hg° with regard to Hg1 were 10.4% ,6.0% ,83.6% ,respectively.The removal efficiency of Hg2 + (87.9%) and Hgp(76.1%)by the WFGPD system were higher than that of Hg (30.4 % ) . The total output mercury of this boiler is a little higher than the total input mercury of the boiler because of statistical error of the fired coal per year and the Ontario Hydro sampling-analytical error of mercury in flue gas. The ratio of output Hg' to input Hg1 is 103.6% ~ 107.4% .The mercury emission factors were that:41.7% of Hg' was found in clinkers and 65.7% of Hg' entered into flue gas before the WFGDP system. When the flue gas was cleaned by the WFGDP system, only 25.05 % Hg1 was emitted to the atmosphere, 26.7 % Hg' discharged into the water and 7.8% Hg' into the cinder. |
来源
|
环境科学研究
,2004,17(2):74-76 【核心库】
|
关键词
|
燃煤烟气
|
地址
|
中国科学院地球化学研究所, 环境地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵州, 贵阳, 550002
|
语种
|
中文 |
文献类型
|
研究性论文 |
ISSN
|
1001-6929 |
学科
|
行业污染、废物处理与综合利用 |
基金
|
国家自然科学基金
;
国家自然科学基金
|
文献收藏号
|
CSCD:1642600
|
参考文献 共
10
共1页
|
1.
Schroeder W H.
Water Air Soil Polut,1989,48(3/4):337-347
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
2.
Mason R P.
Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1994,58(15):3191-3198C
|
CSCD被引
62
次
|
|
|
|
3.
Eric M Prestbo.
Water Air Soil Pollut,1995,80(1/2):145-158
|
CSCD被引
18
次
|
|
|
|
4.
Lindqvist O.
Water Air Soil Pollut,1991,55(1):23-32
|
CSCD被引
124
次
|
|
|
|
5.
Wang Qichao.
Environ Sci Technol,2000,34(13):2711-2713
|
CSCD被引
38
次
|
|
|
|
6.
.
USEPA D6784-02,Standard test method for eleemental,oxidized,particlebound and total mercury in flue gas generated from coal-fired stationary source
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
7.
Thpmas D Brown.
Air Wate Manage Assoc,1999,49:628
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
8.
Chow W.
Power Engineering,1995(1):30-34
|
CSCD被引
2
次
|
|
|
|
9.
R Meij.
Wate Air Soil Pollut,1991,56(1):21-33
|
CSCD被引
24
次
|
|
|
|
10.
Kevin C Galberath.
Environ Sci Technol,1996,30(8):2421-2426
|
CSCD被引
1
次
|
|
|
|
|
|